U.S. v. WRIGHT, CR 115-077. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20151224838
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 253.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DENIES Defendants Gross' and Wright's motions to suppress. (Doc. nos. 169, 183.) SO ORDERED.
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 253.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DENIES Defendants Gross' and Wright's motions to suppress. (Doc. nos. 169, 183.)
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
