THOMPSON v. MAERSK INC., 4:16-C V-00002-LG W-GRS. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160202c37
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . The Plaintiffs have filed a Motion seeking to: 1) to substitute Maersk A/S as a party defendant for the current named Defendant, Maersk Inc.; and 2) to add Kommanditgesellschaft MS "Santa Regina" Offen Reederel GmbH & Co. as a party Defendant to this action. Maersk Inc. does not oppose this motion. Upon due consideration, said Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiffs are directed to file their Amended Complaint, and to perfect service on Defendant K
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . The Plaintiffs have filed a Motion seeking to: 1) to substitute Maersk A/S as a party defendant for the current named Defendant, Maersk Inc.; and 2) to add Kommanditgesellschaft MS "Santa Regina" Offen Reederel GmbH & Co. as a party Defendant to this action. Maersk Inc. does not oppose this motion. Upon due consideration, said Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiffs are directed to file their Amended Complaint, and to perfect service on Defendant Ko..
More
ORDER
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
The Plaintiffs have filed a Motion seeking to:
1) to substitute Maersk A/S as a party defendant for the current named Defendant, Maersk Inc.; and
2) to add Kommanditgesellschaft MS "Santa Regina" Offen Reederel GmbH & Co. as a party Defendant to this action. Maersk Inc. does not oppose this motion.
Upon due consideration, said Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiffs are directed to file their Amended Complaint, and to perfect service on Defendant Kommanditgesellschaft MS "Santa Regina" Offen Reederel GmbH & Co. as allowed by law.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
