ELLIS v. YOUNG, CV 114-048. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160303895
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. nos. 76, 77.) Defendants do not offer any new information, evidence, or argument that warrants a deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and DENIES Defendants motions for su
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. nos. 76, 77.) Defendants do not offer any new information, evidence, or argument that warrants a deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and DENIES Defendants motions for sum..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. nos. 76, 77.) Defendants do not offer any new information, evidence, or argument that warrants a deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and DENIES Defendants§ motions for summary judgment. (Doc. nos. 44, 46).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
