Willis v. U.S., 2:10-cr-61. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160328868
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , Chief District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 12, to which Objections have been filed. Loyd Willis' ("Willis") Objections are not responsive to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Willis has also filed a "Notice of Fiduciary Appointment", dkt. no. 15, by which he seeks to have Magistrate Judge James E. Graham represent his interest
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , Chief District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 12, to which Objections have been filed. Loyd Willis' ("Willis") Objections are not responsive to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Willis has also filed a "Notice of Fiduciary Appointment", dkt. no. 15, by which he seeks to have Magistrate Judge James E. Graham represent his interests..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 12, to which Objections have been filed. Loyd Willis' ("Willis") Objections are not responsive to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Willis has also filed a "Notice of Fiduciary Appointment", dkt. no. 15, by which he seeks to have Magistrate Judge James E. Graham represent his interests in this case. While this pleading is not docketed as a motion, the Court DENIES any such request seeking representation from a judicial officer.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court, and Willis' Objections, dkt no. 14, are OVERRULED. The Court DENIES Willis' Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court also DENIES Willis§ Rule 60(b) (3) Motion. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and/;to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
