McClendon v. Manitou Americas, Inc., 15-CV-00250. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160504b83
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER G. R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay the Pretrial Order Deadline Pending the Court's Ruling on Defendant's Combined Motions for Summary Judgment and Sanctions ("Joint Motion"). Because the Court's ruling on the pending dispositive motions may lead to the dismissal or narrowing of Plaintiffs' claims in this action, preparation of a pretrial order at this point may lead to the expenditure of unnecessary resources by the Parties. Accordi
Summary: ORDER G. R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay the Pretrial Order Deadline Pending the Court's Ruling on Defendant's Combined Motions for Summary Judgment and Sanctions ("Joint Motion"). Because the Court's ruling on the pending dispositive motions may lead to the dismissal or narrowing of Plaintiffs' claims in this action, preparation of a pretrial order at this point may lead to the expenditure of unnecessary resources by the Parties. Accordin..
More
ORDER
G. R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay the Pretrial Order Deadline Pending the Court's Ruling on Defendant's Combined Motions for Summary Judgment and Sanctions ("Joint Motion"). Because the Court's ruling on the pending dispositive motions may lead to the dismissal or narrowing of Plaintiffs' claims in this action, preparation of a pretrial order at this point may lead to the expenditure of unnecessary resources by the Parties. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The current Pretrial Order Deadline is stayed.
2. The Parties shall have thirty (30) days after the Court's ruling on Defendant's dispositive motions to file a proposed Pretrial Order, if necessary.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
