Ware v. Flournoy, 2:15-cv-84. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160511a61
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 10, 2016
Latest Update: May 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , Chief District Judge . Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's March 18, 2016, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 13, to which no objections have been filed. 1 After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge, and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , Chief District Judge . Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's March 18, 2016, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 13, to which no objections have been filed. 1 After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge, and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C...
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's March 18, 2016, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 13, to which no objections have been filed.1 After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge, and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, dkt. no. 1, and DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Petitioner filed a Traverse to the Government's Response on April 7, 2016. Dkt. No. 14. Though this pleading followed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner did not address the Report and Recommendation or any of the Magistrate Judge's conclusions. Id. Petitioner has not filed any pleadings since his Traverse. Moreover, even after considering Petitioner's arguments raised in his Traverse, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge. Thus, to the extent the points raised in the Traverse could be construed as Objections, they are OVERRULED.
Source: Leagle
