Deason v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, CV415-220. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160526b03
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 05, 2016
Latest Update: May 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE Jr. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19), Defendants Dwayne Gibson and Lucius Bobbitt's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30), and Plaintiff's stipulations agreeing with the motions (Doc. 29; Doc. 37) . In the stipulations, the parties agreed to the dismissal of Plaintiff's "failure to promote" claims on the basis that Plaintiff had not properly exhausted his administrative remedies. ( I
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE Jr. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19), Defendants Dwayne Gibson and Lucius Bobbitt's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30), and Plaintiff's stipulations agreeing with the motions (Doc. 29; Doc. 37) . In the stipulations, the parties agreed to the dismissal of Plaintiff's "failure to promote" claims on the basis that Plaintiff had not properly exhausted his administrative remedies. ( Id..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19), Defendants Dwayne Gibson and Lucius Bobbitt's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30), and Plaintiff's stipulations agreeing with the motions (Doc. 29; Doc. 37) . In the stipulations, the parties agreed to the dismissal of Plaintiff's "failure to promote" claims on the basis that Plaintiff had not properly exhausted his administrative remedies. (Id.) However, Plaintiff has now informed the Court that these errors have been rectified. (Doc. 44.) On May 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Consent Motion to Amend Complaint and Extend Discovery (id.), which was granted on May 23, 2016 (Doc. 45). Accordingly, Defendants' motions (Doc. 19; Doc. 30) are DISMISSED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
