U.S. v. PADILLA, CR 113-220. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160721978
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . On June 3, 2016, this Court denied Defendant relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) after a thorough review of the applicability of Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. A few days thereafter, Defendant sent to the Court for filing 1 a motion seeking a reduction under this same guideline amendment. Because the Court has already ruled on this issue, the motion (doc. no. 483) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to attach a copy
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . On June 3, 2016, this Court denied Defendant relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) after a thorough review of the applicability of Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. A few days thereafter, Defendant sent to the Court for filing 1 a motion seeking a reduction under this same guideline amendment. Because the Court has already ruled on this issue, the motion (doc. no. 483) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to attach a copy o..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
On June 3, 2016, this Court denied Defendant relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) after a thorough review of the applicability of Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. A few days thereafter, Defendant sent to the Court for filing1 a motion seeking a reduction under this same guideline amendment. Because the Court has already ruled on this issue, the motion (doc. no. 483) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to attach a copy of the Order of June 3, 2016, to the service copy of this Order.
FootNotes
1. The envelope containing the filing was postmarked on June 7, 2016.
Source: Leagle
