Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MARGEL, CR116-22. (2017)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20170628853
Filed: May 17, 2017
Latest Update: May 17, 2017
Summary: CONSENT ORDER OF FORFEITURE J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . WHEREAS, on March 3, 2016, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of Georgia returned a five-count Indictment against Defendant Ionute Margel and one other charging violations of 18 U.S.C. 1029(b)(2) (Count One — Conspiracy), and 18 U.S.C. 1029(a)(4) (Counts Two through Five — Possession of Access Device-Making Equipment); WHEREAS, the Indictment sought forfeiture pursuant 18 U.S.C. 1029(c)(1)(C) of any pro
More

CONSENT ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, on March 3, 2016, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of Georgia returned a five-count Indictment against Defendant Ionute Margel and one other charging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(b)(2) (Count One — Conspiracy), and 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(4) (Counts Two through Five — Possession of Access Device-Making Equipment);

WHEREAS, the Indictment sought forfeiture pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 1029(c)(1)(C) of any property used or intended to be used to commit such violation(s) charged in Counts One through Five of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Indictment additionally sought forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(B) of any property constituting or derived from any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of such offenses charged in Counts One through Five of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money representing the amount of all gross proceeds obtained as a result of such offenses;

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2016, pursuant to a written plea agreement, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(b)(2), Conspiracy;

WHEREAS, pursuant to his plea agreement, Defendant agreed to entry of an Order of Forfeiture reflecting a money judgment in the amount of all gross proceeds he received directly or indirectly as a result of the offense to which he pled guilty, as determined by the Court at sentencing; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to his plea agreement, Defendant agreed to waive the requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(J), 32.2, and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment without further order of the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(B) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2, Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $146,19102, which is the sum of money equal to all gross proceeds traceable to Defendant's offense of conviction.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to Defendant at the time of sentencing, be made part of the sentence, and be included in the judgment.

3. The United States may, at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part.

4. In accordance with the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853, as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), and Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is authorized to undertake whatever discovery is necessary to identify, locate, or dispose of property subject to forfeiture, or substitute assets for such property.

5. This Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing this Order.

6. The Clerk of the Court shall forward four certified copies of this Order to Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia G. Rhodes, United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia, P.O. Box 2017, Augusta, Georgia 30903.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer