HUMPHREY v. CHEATAM, CV 116-117. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20170719858
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Mills for failure to timely effect service, and DISMISSES Defendant Mills from this case. SO ORDERED.
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, Chief District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Mills for failure to timely effect service, and DISMISSES Defendant Mills from this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
