Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WALKER v. HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, INC., 4:17-CV-00045-WTM-GRS. (2017)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20170720862 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Joint Motion of Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc. d/b/a/ Hyundai Motor Finance ("Hyundai" or "Defendant") and Plaintiff Joyce Walker ("Ms. Walker" or "Plaintiff") (collectively, the "Parties") for a Stay of Discovery (the "Motion") [Doc. 15]. Upon review of the Motion, and it appearing to the Court that: (i) The Parties are in agreement and request a stay of discovery pending the Court's ruling on Hyunda
More

ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY

Before the Court is the Joint Motion of Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc. d/b/a/ Hyundai Motor Finance ("Hyundai" or "Defendant") and Plaintiff Joyce Walker ("Ms. Walker" or "Plaintiff") (collectively, the "Parties") for a Stay of Discovery (the "Motion") [Doc. 15]. Upon review of the Motion, and it appearing to the Court that:

(i) The Parties are in agreement and request a stay of discovery pending the Court's ruling on Hyundai's Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. 13]; and

(ii) The Parties' request for a stay of discovery is not interposed for delay; and

(iii) Good cause exists to stay discovery to avoid unnecessary expense resolving disputes over such discovery and to avoid the expiration and lapsing of deadlines; and

(iv) The requested stay of discovery being warranted and otherwise just and proper;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and discovery in this case is STAYED until such time as the Court rules on Defendant Hyundai's Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or otherwise directs the Parties.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer