USA v. Alexander, CR417-056. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180130938
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Objection to Order. (Doc. 39.) In his filing. Defendant alleges that this Court incorrectly adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) and denied his Amended Motion to Suppress (Doc. 25). Although labeled as an objection, this Court construes Defendant's filing as a motion to reconsider. After careful consideration. Defendant's request (Doc. 39) is DENIED. Defendant has failed to offer
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Objection to Order. (Doc. 39.) In his filing. Defendant alleges that this Court incorrectly adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) and denied his Amended Motion to Suppress (Doc. 25). Although labeled as an objection, this Court construes Defendant's filing as a motion to reconsider. After careful consideration. Defendant's request (Doc. 39) is DENIED. Defendant has failed to offer a..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's Objection to Order. (Doc. 39.) In his filing. Defendant alleges that this Court incorrectly adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) and denied his Amended Motion to Suppress (Doc. 25). Although labeled as an objection, this Court construes Defendant's filing as a motion to reconsider. After careful consideration. Defendant's request (Doc. 39) is DENIED. Defendant has failed to offer any new argument that would cause this Court to question its prior ruling.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
