Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Mitchell, CR597-003. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20180402b40 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Ricky Mitchell's Moti Reduction Under 3582(g)(2). (Doc. 2201.) This Court has repeatedly denied Defendant's request for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582. (Doc. 2154; Doc. 2200.) After reviewing Defendant's motion, the Court again concludes that he is not entitled to a sentence reduction because he is not serving "a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by th
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Ricky Mitchell's Moti Reduction Under 3582(g)(2). (Doc. 2201.) This Court has repeatedly denied Defendant's request for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. (Doc. 2154; Doc. 2200.) After reviewing Defendant's motion, the Court again concludes that he is not entitled to a sentence reduction because he is not serving "a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission." Accordingly, Defendant's motion is DENIED. In addition. Defendant's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 2202) is also DENIED. See United States v. Webb, 565 F.3d 789, 794-95 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that Fifth Amendment does not provide mandatory right to counsel for motions to reduce sentence based on § 3582(c)(2)).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer