Jones v. U.S., 2:12-cr-9. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180406734
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 10, to which Movant Antwan Jones ("Jones") failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Jones' Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence as untimely filed, DENIES Jones in
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 10, to which Movant Antwan Jones ("Jones") failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Jones' Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence as untimely filed, DENIES Jones in f..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 10, to which Movant Antwan Jones ("Jones") failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Jones' Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence as untimely filed, DENIES Jones in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.1
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. To the extent Jones' claims are timely, the Court DENIES Jones' Section 2255 Motion for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No, 10, pp. 7-10.
Source: Leagle
