Robinson-Sims v. Berryhill, CV417-144. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180410884
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment, which seeks reversal and remand pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (Doc. 15.) Pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this Court has the power in social security actions to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision, and to remand the case to the Commissioner. Upon consideration of the motion and for good cause shown, the
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment, which seeks reversal and remand pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (Doc. 15.) Pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this Court has the power in social security actions to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision, and to remand the case to the Commissioner. Upon consideration of the motion and for good cause shown, the ..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment, which seeks reversal and remand pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 15.) Pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this Court has the power in social security actions to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision, and to remand the case to the Commissioner. Upon consideration of the motion and for good cause shown, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner.
Upon remand, the ALJ is DIRECTED to offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, and consider whether Plaintiff's impairments meet or medically equal the requirements of Listing 3.02. If necessary, the ALJ shall obtain medical expert evidence to assist in assessing this Listing, evaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, consider whether Plaintiff can perform any of her past relevant work, and obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence. Following that hearing, the ALJ shall issue a new decision. Following remand, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
