U.S. v. Porter, CR612-012. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180831a73
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant motion for a "status" update regarding the deadline to respond to to his motion to appoint counsel, which was denied by Order on October 24, 2016 (doc. 130) is DENIED as moot. Doc. 127. His "motion for additional consideration under Amendment 794," an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines which is not retroactive and thus has no effect whatsoever on his sentence, is also DENIED . Doc. 137; see doc. 77 (judgment entered March 5, 2013
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant motion for a "status" update regarding the deadline to respond to to his motion to appoint counsel, which was denied by Order on October 24, 2016 (doc. 130) is DENIED as moot. Doc. 127. His "motion for additional consideration under Amendment 794," an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines which is not retroactive and thus has no effect whatsoever on his sentence, is also DENIED . Doc. 137; see doc. 77 (judgment entered March 5, 2013)..
More
ORDER
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant motion for a "status" update regarding the deadline to respond to to his motion to appoint counsel, which was denied by Order on October 24, 2016 (doc. 130) is DENIED as moot. Doc. 127. His "motion for additional consideration under Amendment 794," an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines which is not retroactive and thus has no effect whatsoever on his sentence, is also DENIED. Doc. 137; see doc. 77 (judgment entered March 5, 2013); U.S.S.G. App. C, Amendment 794 (effective November 1, 2015); U.S.S.G. §1B1.10(a)(2) (list of all retroactive amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, of which Amendment 794 is conspicuously absent).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
