Rofila v. Gartland, 5:18-cv-10. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180913g39
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 15, to which Petitioner Martin Rofila ("Rofila") failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Rofila's 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition, DENIES Rofila in forma pauperis st
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 15, to which Petitioner Martin Rofila ("Rofila") failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Rofila's 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition, DENIES Rofila in forma pauperis sta..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 15, to which Petitioner Martin Rofila ("Rofila") failed to file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Rofila's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, DENIES Rofila in forma pauperis status on appeal, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
