U.S. v. Youmans, CR 418-032. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20181026c19
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GRAHAM , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Made Youmans requests that the Court consider whether pretrial release is appropriate, given counsel's "information and belief that the . . . state charges [mooting the issue of pretrial release] have been disposed of and all such `holds' resolved." Doc. 42 at 1. The Government, as well as the United States Probation Office, respond that the state charges, and their associated "holds," remain in place. See doc. 47. Accordingly, the que
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GRAHAM , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Made Youmans requests that the Court consider whether pretrial release is appropriate, given counsel's "information and belief that the . . . state charges [mooting the issue of pretrial release] have been disposed of and all such `holds' resolved." Doc. 42 at 1. The Government, as well as the United States Probation Office, respond that the state charges, and their associated "holds," remain in place. See doc. 47. Accordingly, the ques..
More
ORDER
JAMES E. GRAHAM, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Made Youmans requests that the Court consider whether pretrial release is appropriate, given counsel's "information and belief that the . . . state charges [mooting the issue of pretrial release] have been disposed of and all such `holds' resolved." Doc. 42 at 1. The Government, as well as the United States Probation Office, respond that the state charges, and their associated "holds," remain in place. See doc. 47. Accordingly, the question of pretrial release is moot and a hearing is unnecessary. Youmans' request is, therefore, DENIED. Doc. 42.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
