Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Price v. City of Brooklet, CV618-128. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20190130b25 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. GRAHAM , Magistrate Judge . The parties have submitted their joint status report proposing that all deadlines be stayed pending potential consolidation of this case with four other Complaints — currently stayed due to bankruptcy proceedings — involving common counsel and defendants. Doc. 12 at 3. While the bankrupt defendant is not a party to this action, the parties believe parallel discovery and Rule 26 actions would eliminate unnecessarily duplicative discovery. Id. Thu
More

ORDER

The parties have submitted their joint status report proposing that all deadlines be stayed pending potential consolidation of this case with four other Complaints — currently stayed due to bankruptcy proceedings — involving common counsel and defendants. Doc. 12 at 3. While the bankrupt defendant is not a party to this action, the parties believe parallel discovery and Rule 26 actions would eliminate unnecessarily duplicative discovery. Id. Thus, the Court DEFERS issuing a Scheduling Order until the bankruptcy stays are resolved in the other four cases. That stay should not in any way prevent the parties in this case from engaging in good faith settlement discussions in the meantime. Upon the lifting of the bankruptcy stays, the parties shall have 14 days to confer and submit a proposed Scheduling Order setting forth their agreed-upon discovery and motion schedule. However, if the bankruptcy stays are not timely resolved, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report within 60 days of the date of this Order so apprising the Court.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer