Moore-Montgomery v. Berryhill, 6:17-cv-162. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190304740
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After a careful de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's January 15, 2019 Report and Recommendation, (doc. 14), to which the parties have not filed any objections. Accordingly, Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, AFFIRMS the Acting Commissioner's final decision, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and ENTER final judgment in favor of the Acting Comm
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After a careful de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's January 15, 2019 Report and Recommendation, (doc. 14), to which the parties have not filed any objections. Accordingly, Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, AFFIRMS the Acting Commissioner's final decision, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and ENTER final judgment in favor of the Acting Commi..
More
ORDER
R. STAN BAKER, District Judge.
After a careful de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's January 15, 2019 Report and Recommendation, (doc. 14), to which the parties have not filed any objections. Accordingly, Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, AFFIRMS the Acting Commissioner's final decision, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and ENTER final judgment in favor of the Acting Commissioner.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
