Mitchell v. Berry, 6:17-cv-164. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190311963
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 12). Petitioner William Mitchell ("Mitchell") did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 7), DISMISSES Mitchell's 28 U.S.
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 12). Petitioner William Mitchell ("Mitchell") did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 7), DISMISSES Mitchell's 28 U.S.C..
More
ORDER
R. STAN BAKER, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 12). Petitioner William Mitchell ("Mitchell") did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 7), DISMISSES Mitchell's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (doc. 1), DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case, and DENIES Mitchell in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
