Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Garrett v. Meeks, 6:17-cv-120. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20190401b04 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 22.) Neither party to this action filed Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 22), as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief
More

ORDER

After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 22.) Neither party to this action filed Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 22), as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's request for compensatory damages. The Court DENIES in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendant Meeks remains pending, as does Plaintiff's requests for nominal damages, prospective injunctive relief, and court costs and fees. (Doc. 1, p. 6; Doc. 8, p. 1; Doc. 11; Doc. 22, pp. 2 n.1, 15-19.)

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer