Dixon v. U.S., CR512-018. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190410923
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Petitioner Andrew Dixon's Motion for Clarification of Sentence. (Doc. 29.) 1 In the motion, Petitioner requests this Court "clarify as how petitioner was enhanced and sentenced under the ACCA" and "show where the enhancement 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) is presented in any files dealing with Petitioner." ( Id. at 1.) After careful consideration, Petitioner's motion must be denied. Petitioner appears to be requesting a review of all
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is Petitioner Andrew Dixon's Motion for Clarification of Sentence. (Doc. 29.) 1 In the motion, Petitioner requests this Court "clarify as how petitioner was enhanced and sentenced under the ACCA" and "show where the enhancement 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) is presented in any files dealing with Petitioner." ( Id. at 1.) After careful consideration, Petitioner's motion must be denied. Petitioner appears to be requesting a review of all f..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner Andrew Dixon's Motion for Clarification of Sentence. (Doc. 29.)1 In the motion, Petitioner requests this Court "clarify as how petitioner was enhanced and sentenced under the ACCA" and "show where the enhancement 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) is presented in any files dealing with Petitioner." (Id. at 1.) After careful consideration, Petitioner's motion must be denied.
Petitioner appears to be requesting a review of all filings that reference his enhanced sentence pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) ("ACCA"). This Court finds that it is unnecessary to clarify its sentencing as numerous orders and filings in Petitioner's criminal and civil actions have discussed Petitioner's status as an armed career criminal. (See, e.g., Case No. CR512-018, Doc. 92, Doc. 105; Case No. CV515-051, Doc. 20, Doc. 22.) Petitioner is advised to carefully read this Court's and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's previous orders. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion (Doc. 29) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Unless otherwise stated, all citations are to Petitioner's civil docket, Case No. CV515-051. This motion was also filed in Petitioner's criminal docket, Case No. CR512-018, at Document 147.
Source: Leagle
