GJ&L, Inc. v. CNH Industrial America, LLC, CV 117-179. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190506a16
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 03, 2019
Latest Update: May 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . In consideration of the telephone conference on April 25, 2019, the parties shall conduct the deposition of Jennifer Craig, a former employee of Defendant, as soon as possible and the deposition of Jennifer Roth, a current employee of Defendant, as soon as practicable after the birth of her child but not later than the first week of her return from maternity leave in early July. The delay in taking these depositions will not necessitate reopening the
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . In consideration of the telephone conference on April 25, 2019, the parties shall conduct the deposition of Jennifer Craig, a former employee of Defendant, as soon as possible and the deposition of Jennifer Roth, a current employee of Defendant, as soon as practicable after the birth of her child but not later than the first week of her return from maternity leave in early July. The delay in taking these depositions will not necessitate reopening the ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge.
In consideration of the telephone conference on April 25, 2019, the parties shall conduct the deposition of Jennifer Craig, a former employee of Defendant, as soon as possible and the deposition of Jennifer Roth, a current employee of Defendant, as soon as practicable after the birth of her child but not later than the first week of her return from maternity leave in early July. The delay in taking these depositions will not necessitate reopening the discovery period or extending the deadline for filing summary judgment motions, as counsel confirmed during the hearing. However, Plaintiff may seek an extension of the deadline for filing its summary judgment reply brief if (1) Defendant relies on affidavit testimony from either Ms. Craig or Ms. Roth in its summary judgment opposition; and (2) the parties, despite their very best efforts, have been unable to conduct the affiant's deposition. For these reasons, Defendant's Emergency Motion to Quash Deposition Notices and/or Motion for Protective Order is MOOT. (Doc. no. 77.)
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
