Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States Of America v. Funds Seized from Fidelity Investments, CV 316-020. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20190606g32 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN , District Judge . Before the Court in the captioned matter is a motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) filed by Laurens County, Georgia. Laurens County claims an interest in certain real property subject to this forfeiture action, namely Real Property Located at 3037 Hwy 257, Dublin, Georgia. More specifically, Laurens County seeks to acquire 0.089 acres of right of way in said property for a state funded highway construction project.
More

ORDER

Before the Court in the captioned matter is a motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) filed by Laurens County, Georgia. Laurens County claims an interest in certain real property subject to this forfeiture action, namely Real Property Located at 3037 Hwy 257, Dublin, Georgia. More specifically, Laurens County seeks to acquire 0.089 acres of right of way in said property for a state funded highway construction project. Neither the United States of America nor Claimant Lisa Bird oppose the motion.

The Eleventh Circuit has set forth a four-part test to evaluate an application for intervention. First, the intervention application must be timely. Second, the intervenor must have an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action. Third, the intervenor must be "so situated that disposition of the action, as a practical matter, may impede or impair the ability to protect that interest." Fourth, the existing parties to the lawsuit must not adequately represent the interests of the intervenor. E.q., Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308, 1311 (11th Cir. 2005); Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1308-09 (11th Cir. 2004).

Here, Laurens County filed its motion during the discovery phase of the case and does not plan to conduct any discovery; thus, the motion is timely. Also, Laurens County claims a ^Mirect, substantial and legally protectable" interest in the property in dispute, see Georgia v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 302 F.3d 1242, 1249 (11th Cir. 2002) (cited source omitted); specifically, Laurens County claims an interest in real property the title to which is at issue. See Foster v. Gueory, 655 F.2d 1319, 1324 (D.C. Cir. 1981) ("An intervenor's interest is obvious when he asserts a claim to property that is the subject matter of the suit."). Further, the disposition of this action, which would necessarily determine the ownership of the property, would impair Laurens County's ability to protect its interest in the property. Finally, the existing parties to the lawsuit cannot adequately protect the interests of Laurens County.

Upon the foregoing, Laurens County is entitled to intervene as of right under Rule 24(a)(2) in this case. Accordingly, its motion to intervene (doc. no. 51) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall add Laurens County to the case as an "Intervenor" and docket its "Intervenor Complaint" in the case, which is attached to the motion to intervene as Exhibit A.

Further, Intervenor Laurens County indicates in its Intervenor Complaint that it stands ready to deposit the sum of $7,850.00 as just and adequate compensation for fee simple title into the Registry of the Court for the benefit of the persons entitled to it. (Intervenor Compl. ¶¶ 13-14.) The payment of estimated compensation is a prerequisite to the exercise of condemnation of real property in the State of Georgia. See O.C.G.A. §§ 32-3-6, 32-3-7. Accordingly, the Court finds it appropriate to accept the estimated compensation from Laurens County and hereby directs the Clerk to receive and hold in the Registry of the Court the amount of $7,850.00 paid by Intervenor Laurens County until further Order of the Court. After making the aforementioned deposit, Intervenor Laurens County may proceed by motion for such other and final relief deemed proper to secure acquisition of the property interest it seeks.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer