U.S. v. McKenzie, CR418-259. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190618b79
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2019
Summary: WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Solomon Amusan counsel of record for defendant Malik McKenzie in the above-styled case has moved for leave of absence. The Court is mindful that personal and professional obligations require the absence of counsel on occasion. The Court, however, cannot accommodate its schedule to the thousands of attorneys who practice within the Southern District of Georgia. Counsel may be absent at the times requested. However, nothing shall prevent the case from
Summary: WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Solomon Amusan counsel of record for defendant Malik McKenzie in the above-styled case has moved for leave of absence. The Court is mindful that personal and professional obligations require the absence of counsel on occasion. The Court, however, cannot accommodate its schedule to the thousands of attorneys who practice within the Southern District of Georgia. Counsel may be absent at the times requested. However, nothing shall prevent the case from g..
More
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Solomon Amusan counsel of record for defendant Malik McKenzie in the above-styled case has moved for leave of absence. The Court is mindful that personal and professional obligations require the absence of counsel on occasion. The Court, however, cannot accommodate its schedule to the thousands of attorneys who practice within the Southern District of Georgia.
Counsel may be absent at the times requested. However, nothing shall prevent the case from going forward; all discovery shall proceed, status conferences, pretrial conferences, and trial shall not be interrupted or delayed. It is the affirmative obligation of counsel to provide a fitting substitute.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
