Heinisch v. Bernardini, CV414-221. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190701972
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . On June 20, 2019, the Court held an initial pretrial conference and referred this case to the undersigned for disposition. Doc. 82, doc. 83. Also at that pretrial conference, plaintiff indicated that she did not object to the substitution of K.S. as plaintiff now that K.S. has reached the age of majority. As a result, plaintiff shall have ten days from the date of this order to make any voluntary substitution. If plaintiff elects not to make su
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . On June 20, 2019, the Court held an initial pretrial conference and referred this case to the undersigned for disposition. Doc. 82, doc. 83. Also at that pretrial conference, plaintiff indicated that she did not object to the substitution of K.S. as plaintiff now that K.S. has reached the age of majority. As a result, plaintiff shall have ten days from the date of this order to make any voluntary substitution. If plaintiff elects not to make suc..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER L. RAY, Magistrate Judge.
On June 20, 2019, the Court held an initial pretrial conference and referred this case to the undersigned for disposition. Doc. 82, doc. 83. Also at that pretrial conference, plaintiff indicated that she did not object to the substitution of K.S. as plaintiff now that K.S. has reached the age of majority. As a result, plaintiff shall have ten days from the date of this order to make any voluntary substitution. If plaintiff elects not to make such a substitution, plaintiff should provide to the court a brief—no longer than 10 pages—explaining why such a substitution is unnecessary.
SO ORDERED,
Source: Leagle
