Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Palmer v. Robbins, 4:19-cv-00167. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20190730c00 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . On July 18, 2019, Defendants filed a Consent Motion to Stay Discovery. (Doc. 5). Defendants seek to stay discovery, including the initial conference and reporting obligations under Local Rule 26, pending final resolution of their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Id. Defendants' Consent Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 5) is hereby GRANTED. The parties shall not seek discovery until a final ruling has been issued on Defendants' pending Mot
More

ORDER

On July 18, 2019, Defendants filed a Consent Motion to Stay Discovery. (Doc. 5). Defendants seek to stay discovery, including the initial conference and reporting obligations under Local Rule 26, pending final resolution of their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Id. Defendants' Consent Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 5) is hereby GRANTED. The parties shall not seek discovery until a final ruling has been issued on Defendants' pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.

In the event that any of Plaintiff's claims are allowed to proceed for further factual development, the parties shall meet and confer within twenty-one days of the Court's Order on Defendants' pending motion for judgment on the pleadings. (See L.R. 26.1(e)). A proposed discovery plan must then be submitted to the Court within fourteen days of the parties' Rule 26(f) conference. (See L.R. 26.1(b)).

SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer