Filed: Aug. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed.(Doc. nos. 85, 86.) Both Plaintiff and Defendants object to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs and Defendants' objections, (doc. nos. 85, 86), ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Def
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed.(Doc. nos. 85, 86.) Both Plaintiff and Defendants object to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs and Defendants' objections, (doc. nos. 85, 86), ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defe..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, Chief District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed.(Doc. nos. 85, 86.) Both Plaintiff and Defendants object to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs and Defendants' objections, (doc. nos. 85, 86), ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion for summary judgment, (doc. no. 68), resulting only in summary judgment for Defendants Wilkes and Chance on Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against them. The case shall proceed to trial on Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Sergeant Ross arising out of the taser application on March 27, 2017.
SO ORDERED.
