Hoke v. Lyte, 6:16-cv-45. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190917a59
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 61). Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lane, Dozier, Allen, and Pinero and his claims brought under Geo
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 61). Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lane, Dozier, Allen, and Pinero and his claims brought under Geor..
More
ORDER
R. STAN BAKER, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 61). Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lane, Dozier, Allen, and Pinero and his claims brought under Georgia law. The Court also GRANTS Defendants Lyte, Henry, and Williams' Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 52), DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
