Smith v. United States, CR407-288. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20191227781
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2), to which no objections have been filed. 1 After careful consideration and review of the record, the report and recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. Accordingly, Movant's unauthorized successive 2255 motion is DISMISSED. As a result, Movant's subsequent Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. In addition. P
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2), to which no objections have been filed. 1 After careful consideration and review of the record, the report and recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. Accordingly, Movant's unauthorized successive 2255 motion is DISMISSED. As a result, Movant's subsequent Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. In addition. Pl..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2), to which no objections have been filed.1 After careful consideration and review of the record, the report and recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. Accordingly, Movant's unauthorized successive § 2255 motion is DISMISSED. As a result, Movant's subsequent Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. In addition. Plaintiff is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability, rendering moot any request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Unless otherwise stated, all citations are to Movant's civil docket on this Court's electronic filing system, CV419-306.
Source: Leagle
