Houston v. Deal, 5:18-cv-35. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200224521
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hadden. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Deal remain pending. SO ORDERE
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hadden. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Deal remain pending. SO ORDERED..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hadden. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Deal remain pending.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
