White v. Procter, 2:18-cv-71. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200305b63
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2020
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , Chief District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 19. No party filed Objections to this Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES Plaintiff's failure to protect claims against Defendant King. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Procter, Mastrolanni
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , Chief District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 19. No party filed Objections to this Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES Plaintiff's failure to protect claims against Defendant King. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Procter, Mastrolanni,..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 19. No party filed Objections to this Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES Plaintiff's failure to protect claims against Defendant King. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Procter, Mastrolanni, Watson, and Nurse Mike Castillo remain pending.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
