Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Oliver v. Lyft, Inc., CV419-125. (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20200309806 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . The district judge adopted the undersigned's recommendation that pro se plaintiff Anthony Oliver's filings in this case—and any other case he files—be restricted, due to the vexatious character of his litigation. See doc. 56. Oliver appealed that order. See doc. 59. That appeal is still pending, as is Oliver's appeal of the same Order in a virtually identical case. See Oliver v. Lyft, Inc., CV419-063 (S.D. Ga.). As the appeal of the Co
More

ORDER

The district judge adopted the undersigned's recommendation that pro se plaintiff Anthony Oliver's filings in this case—and any other case he files—be restricted, due to the vexatious character of his litigation. See doc. 56. Oliver appealed that order. See doc. 59. That appeal is still pending, as is Oliver's appeal of the same Order in a virtually identical case. See Oliver v. Lyft, Inc., CV419-063 (S.D. Ga.).

As the appeal of the Court's order remains pending, it is not clear whether and under what terms Oliver might continue to prosecute this case. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINSTRATIVELY TERMINATE all motions currently pending in this case until the Court of Appeals has ruled. Docs. 46, 50, 51. Upon the entry of the Court of Appeals disposition by the district judge, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reinstate all motions currently pending.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer