United States v. Williams, CR 419-089. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200310842
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2020
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 70. Although nothing labeled "objections" has been filed in response thereto, two of Defendant's recent filings, dkt. nos. 111 and 112, could be liberally construed as objections. To the extent Defendant intended those filings to serve as objections to the Report and Recommendation, they are OVERRULED. The very thorough Rep
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . After an independent review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 70. Although nothing labeled "objections" has been filed in response thereto, two of Defendant's recent filings, dkt. nos. 111 and 112, could be liberally construed as objections. To the extent Defendant intended those filings to serve as objections to the Report and Recommendation, they are OVERRULED. The very thorough Repo..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge.
After an independent review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 70. Although nothing labeled "objections" has been filed in response thereto, two of Defendant's recent filings, dkt. nos. 111 and 112, could be liberally construed as objections. To the extent Defendant intended those filings to serve as objections to the Report and Recommendation, they are OVERRULED. The very thorough Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is legally and factually correct in all respects, and nothing in the Defendant's latest filings undermines it. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
