STATE v. STONE, SCWC-30059. (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of Hawaii
Number: inhaco20130111199
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant's application for writ of certiorari filed on November 30, 2012, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DISSENT IN PART BY ACOBA, J. I respectfully dissent in part and would set this case for oral argument in view of the
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant's application for writ of certiorari filed on November 30, 2012, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DISSENT IN PART BY ACOBA, J. I respectfully dissent in part and would set this case for oral argument in view of the ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant's application for writ of certiorari filed on November 30, 2012, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DISSENT IN PART BY ACOBA, J.
I respectfully dissent in part and would set this case for oral argument in view of the burgeoning and continuing question of the jurisdictional effect of defective charges.
Source: Leagle
