ROLLINS v. MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY, 10-00336 HG-KSC. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Hawaii
Number: infdco20120626d15
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANTS R & D DOMINGO, INC. DBA MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY, (ERRONEOUSLY SUED HEREIN AS MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY), RACHEL DOMINGO, DONOVAN DOMINGO'S PETITION FOR ORDER DETERMINING GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT (DOC. 205) HELEN GILLMOR, District Judge. Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on May 15, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to T
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANTS R & D DOMINGO, INC. DBA MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY, (ERRONEOUSLY SUED HEREIN AS MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY), RACHEL DOMINGO, DONOVAN DOMINGO'S PETITION FOR ORDER DETERMINING GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT (DOC. 205) HELEN GILLMOR, District Judge. Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on May 15, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Ti..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANTS R & D DOMINGO, INC. DBA MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY, (ERRONEOUSLY SUED HEREIN AS MAUI DREAMS DIVE COMPANY), RACHEL DOMINGO, DONOVAN DOMINGO'S PETITION FOR ORDER DETERMINING GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT (DOC. 205)
HELEN GILLMOR, District Judge.
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on May 15, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636 (b) (1) (C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations on Defendants R & D Domingo, Inc. DBA Maui Dreams Dive Company, (Erroneously Sued Herein as Maui Dreams Dive Company), Rachel Domingo, Donovan Domingo Petition for Order Determining Good Faith Settlement" (Doc. 205), filed May 15, 2012, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
