DONALD E. O'BRIEN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Chief Magistrate Judge Paul A. Zoss's Report and Recommendation Concerning Guilty Plea (Docket No. 15, 03/15/2012).
On February 23, 2012, a one count Indictment (Docket No. 2) was returned in the above-referenced case. On March 15, 2012, Defendant Rigoberto Niz-Chavez entered a guilty to plea to Count 1 before Chief United States Magistrate Judge Paul A. Zoss.
Count 1 of the Indictment charges that on or about February 7, 2012, in the Northern District of Iowa, defendant Rigoberto Niz-Chavez, an alien citizen of Guatemala, was found knowingly and unlawfully in the United States after having been previously removed from the United States to Guatemala on or about February 16, 2007. Defendant did not obtain the express consent of the Attorney General of the United States or his successor, the Secretary for Homeland Security (Title 6, United States Code, Section 202(3) and (4) and Section 557), to reapply for admission into the United States prior to re-entering the United States after February 16, 2007, on an unknown date at an unknown location.
This was in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1326(a).
The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 15), states that there is no plea agreement and recommends that defendant Rigoberto Niz-Chavez's guilty plea be accepted. Waivers of objections to Judge Zoss's Report and Recommendation were filed by each party (Docket Nos. 17 and 18). The Court, therefore, undertakes the necessary review to accept defendant Rigoberto Niz-Chavez's plea in this case.
Pursuant to statue, this Court's standard of review for a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is as follows:
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Similarly, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides for review of a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation on dispositive motions and prisoner petitions, where objections are made as follows:
FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
As mentioned, waivers of objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and it appears to the Court upon review of Chief Magistrate Judge Zoss's findings and conclusions that there are no grounds to reject or modify them.