Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA LINDA R. READE, Chief District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On June 4, 2014, a three-count Indictment was filed against the defendant, Alexander Marcus King. On October 23, 2014, the defendant appeared before United States Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S. Scoles and entered pleas of guilty to Counts 1, 3 and 4 of the Indictment. On October 23, 2014, Judge Scoles filed a Report and Recommendation i
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA LINDA R. READE, Chief District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On June 4, 2014, a three-count Indictment was filed against the defendant, Alexander Marcus King. On October 23, 2014, the defendant appeared before United States Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S. Scoles and entered pleas of guilty to Counts 1, 3 and 4 of the Indictment. On October 23, 2014, Judge Scoles filed a Report and Recommendation in..
More
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA
LINDA R. READE, Chief District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
On June 4, 2014, a three-count Indictment was filed against the defendant, Alexander Marcus King. On October 23, 2014, the defendant appeared before United States Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S. Scoles and entered pleas of guilty to Counts 1, 3 and 4 of the Indictment. On October 23, 2014, Judge Scoles filed a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that the court accept the defendant's guilty pleas. On October 23, 2014, the defendant filed a Waiver of Objections to Report and Recommendation. The court, therefore, undertakes the necessary review of Judge Scoles's recommendation to accept the defendant's pleas in this case.
II. ANALYSIS
Pursuant to statute, this court's standard of review for a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is as follows:
A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Similarly, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides for review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation on dispositive motions and prisoner petitions, where objections are made, as follows:
The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
In this case, no objections have been filed, and it appears to the court upon review of Judge Scoles's findings and conclusions that there is no ground to reject or modify them. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS Judge Scoles's Report and Recommendation of October 23, 2014, and ACCEPTS the defendant's pleas of guilty to Counts 1, 3 and 4 of the Indictment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
