Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER LINDA R. READE , District Judge . On November 20, 2017, the court accepted the jury verdict finding Defendant Kevin Oscar Naholi guilty on Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant is adjudicated guilty of Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment. 2. The United States Probation Office is directed to conduct a presentence investigation and prepare a report. 3. The attorneys must timely comply with the deadlines for preparation of the pr
Summary: ORDER LINDA R. READE , District Judge . On November 20, 2017, the court accepted the jury verdict finding Defendant Kevin Oscar Naholi guilty on Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant is adjudicated guilty of Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment. 2. The United States Probation Office is directed to conduct a presentence investigation and prepare a report. 3. The attorneys must timely comply with the deadlines for preparation of the pre..
More
ORDER
LINDA R. READE, District Judge.
On November 20, 2017, the court accepted the jury verdict finding Defendant Kevin Oscar Naholi guilty on Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant is adjudicated guilty of Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment.
2. The United States Probation Office is directed to conduct a presentence investigation and prepare a report.
3. The attorneys must timely comply with the deadlines for preparation of the presentence report.
4. Defendant is to remain in custody pending sentencing.
5. The parties are reminded that "[e]xcept by leave of court, no party or lawyer, and no other person acting on their behalf, may contact, interview, examine or question any trial juror or potential trial juror before, during, or after a trial concerning the juror's actual or potential jury service." LR 47.
IT IS SO ORDERED.