Filed: Jun. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER LINDA R. READE , District Judge . On June 7, 2018, the court accepted the jury verdict finding Defendant Jose Lopez-Garcia guilty on Count 1 and not guilty on Count 2 of the Superseding Indictment (docket no. 26). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant is adjudicated guilty of Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment. 2. The United States Probation Office is directed to conduct a presentence investigation and prepare a report. 3. The attorneys must timely comply with t
Summary: ORDER LINDA R. READE , District Judge . On June 7, 2018, the court accepted the jury verdict finding Defendant Jose Lopez-Garcia guilty on Count 1 and not guilty on Count 2 of the Superseding Indictment (docket no. 26). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant is adjudicated guilty of Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment. 2. The United States Probation Office is directed to conduct a presentence investigation and prepare a report. 3. The attorneys must timely comply with th..
More
ORDER
LINDA R. READE, District Judge.
On June 7, 2018, the court accepted the jury verdict finding Defendant Jose Lopez-Garcia guilty on Count 1 and not guilty on Count 2 of the Superseding Indictment (docket no. 26).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant is adjudicated guilty of Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment.
2. The United States Probation Office is directed to conduct a presentence investigation and prepare a report.
3. The attorneys must timely comply with the deadlines for preparation of the presentence report.
4. Defendant is to remain in custody pending sentencing.
5. The parties are reminded that "[e]xcept by leave of court, no party or lawyer, and no other person acting on their behalf, may contact, interview, examine, or question any . . . criminal trial juror . . . before, during, or after a trial concerning the juror's actual or potential jury service." LR 47.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
