STATE v. JONES, 38456. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Idaho
Number: inidco20110921210
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2011
Summary: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY PER CURIAM Christopher Max Jones pled guilty to felony malicious injury to property pursuant to a plea agreement. Idaho Code 18-7001(2)(a). The district court sentenced Jones to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Jones appeals. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness o
Summary: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY PER CURIAM Christopher Max Jones pled guilty to felony malicious injury to property pursuant to a plea agreement. Idaho Code 18-7001(2)(a). The district court sentenced Jones to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Jones appeals. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of..
More
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
PER CURIAM
Christopher Max Jones pled guilty to felony malicious injury to property pursuant to a plea agreement. Idaho Code § 18-7001(2)(a). The district court sentenced Jones to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Jones appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Jones's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Source: Leagle
