Filed: Nov. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2014
Summary: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY PER CURIAM. Cayde Lee Lish was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, I.C. 18-4006(1), and use of a deadly weapon, I.C. 19-2520. The district court sentenced Lish to a unified term of twenty-two years, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. Lish filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Lish appeals. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the f
Summary: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY PER CURIAM. Cayde Lee Lish was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, I.C. 18-4006(1), and use of a deadly weapon, I.C. 19-2520. The district court sentenced Lish to a unified term of twenty-two years, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. Lish filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Lish appeals. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the fa..
More
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
PER CURIAM.
Cayde Lee Lish was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, I.C. § 18-4006(1), and use of a deadly weapon, I.C. § 19-2520. The district court sentenced Lish to a unified term of twenty-two years, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. Lish filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Lish appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Lish's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
