Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Chavez-Macias, 1:16-cr-067-BLW. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Idaho Number: infdco20180205b42 Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2018
Summary: FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . WHEREAS, on October 31, 2017, this Court entered Preliminary Orders of Forfeiture (ECF Nos. 157 and 158) as to the defendants herein pursuant to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. 853, based upon the guilty verdicts entered in the above case on June 1, 2017 (ECF No. 142), finding the defendants guilty of a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The preliminary orders forfeit a personal money judgment against both defendants in
More

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2017, this Court entered Preliminary Orders of Forfeiture (ECF Nos. 157 and 158) as to the defendants herein pursuant to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853, based upon the guilty verdicts entered in the above case on June 1, 2017 (ECF No. 142), finding the defendants guilty of a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The preliminary orders forfeit a personal money judgment against both defendants in an amount not to exceed the sum of $420,000 as set out in the forfeiture allegation of the Superseding Indictment and the preliminary orders entered after the return of such guilty verdicts; and

WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) provides that "no ancillary proceeding is required to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a money judgment."

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States' Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture (ECF No. 184) is GRANTED and the defendants shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $420,000.00, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Order; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States may, at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property having a value not to exceed $420,000.00, to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer