Schaeffer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 4:17-cv-00262-BLW. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20180313869
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . On December 22, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Candy Dale issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13) be granted. Any party may challenge a magistrate judge's proposed recommendation by filing written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The distric
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . On December 22, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Candy Dale issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13) be granted. Any party may challenge a magistrate judge's proposed recommendation by filing written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The district..
More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.
On December 22, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Candy Dale issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13) be granted. Any party may challenge a magistrate judge's proposed recommendation by filing written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court must then "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. The district court may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
In this case, neither party objected to Magistrate Judge Dale's R&R, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. Accordingly, the Court need not make a de novo review of any portions of the R&R. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the entire decision, and determined that it will accept the R&R in whole, and adopt it as its own findings and conclusions.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation entered on December 22, 2017 (Dkt. 23) shall be, and is hereby, INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED in its entirety.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) is GRANTED.
3. The Court will enter a separate judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
Source: Leagle
