B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.
The defendant has filed a motion to suppress. The motion seeks to suppress evidence that might form the basis for the charges in this case. Accordingly, the motion must be resolved before trial and there is excludable time between the date of its filing and a reasonable time for its prompt resolution. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(D); United States v. Tinklenberg 131 S.Ct. 2007 (2011).
Trial is presently set for November 5, 2018. But the briefing on the motion to suppress will not be completed until that time, and the Court cannot hold a hearing until November 19, 2018, and will need additional time to render a decision. The Court finds that setting trial on January 7, 2019, will provide a reasonable time to hear and resolve the motion.
The Court finds that the period of delay between the filing of the motion to suppress (docket no. 26) and the resolution of the motion is excludable time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D). Accordingly,
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the present trial date of November 5, 2018, is VACATED, and that a new trial date be set for
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the pretrial conference shall be held on
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all pretrial motions shall be filed on or before
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the period of time between the filing date of the motion to suppress (docket no. 26), and the resolution of the motion within a prompt time is excludable time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a hearing shall be held on the motion to suppress on