SBP LLLP v. Hoffman Construction Company of America, 1:19-cv-00266-DCN. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20200122d54
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DAVID C. NYE , Chief District Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is SBP LLLP ("SBP"), JRS Properties III LP ("JRS"), and J.R. Simplot Foundation, Inc.'s ("Foundation") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction Order. Dkt. 29. The Court finds good cause to GRANT Plaintiffs' Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction. For the same reasons set forth in its initial Order (Dkt. 27) granting Plaintiffs' Motion f
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DAVID C. NYE , Chief District Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is SBP LLLP ("SBP"), JRS Properties III LP ("JRS"), and J.R. Simplot Foundation, Inc.'s ("Foundation") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction Order. Dkt. 29. The Court finds good cause to GRANT Plaintiffs' Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction. For the same reasons set forth in its initial Order (Dkt. 27) granting Plaintiffs' Motion fo..
More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID C. NYE, Chief District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is SBP LLLP ("SBP"), JRS Properties III LP ("JRS"), and J.R. Simplot Foundation, Inc.'s ("Foundation") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction Order. Dkt. 29. The Court finds good cause to GRANT Plaintiffs' Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction.
For the same reasons set forth in its initial Order (Dkt. 27) granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 24), the Court grants Plaintiffs' request to extend the stay on arbitration. However, Plaintiffs request that this stay extend until the date on which the Court issues its decision regarding whether Plaintiffs agreed to arbitrate this action. The parties' stipulated litigation plan establishes that the earliest the Court might hold the bench trial on this matter to decide this issue is June 2020. Dkt. 28. Because Hoffman currently does not object to the Court extending the preliminary injunction for that length of time (Dkt. 31), the Court shall grant Plaintiffs' request. However, if at any time Hoffman changes its posture and objects to the length of the extension, the Court shall revisit this matter.
II. ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs' Request for Extension of Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 29) is GRANTED.
2. Arbitration shall be STAYED until the Court issues its decision regarding whether Plaintiffs agreed to arbitrate this matter, unless Hoffman objects to the length of the extension of the stay or the Court otherwise orders.
Source: Leagle
