NEELEY v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC, 14-cv-1413. (2015)
Court: District Court, C.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20151120b58
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER JOE BILLY McDADE , Senior District Judge This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Hawley's Report & Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 22) recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a Court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The parties were notified that failure to object to Judge Hawley's November 3, 2015 R&R within fourteen days after service of the R&R would constitute a waiver of any o
Summary: ORDER JOE BILLY McDADE , Senior District Judge This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Hawley's Report & Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 22) recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a Court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The parties were notified that failure to object to Judge Hawley's November 3, 2015 R&R within fourteen days after service of the R&R would constitute a waiver of any ob..
More
ORDER
JOE BILLY McDADE, Senior District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Hawley's Report & Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 22) recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a Court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The parties were notified that failure to object to Judge Hawley's November 3, 2015 R&R within fourteen days after service of the R&R would constitute a waiver of any objections. (Doc. 21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Lorentzen v. Anderson Pest Control, 64 F.3d 327, 330 (7th Cir. 1995). Objections to the R&R were due by November 17, 2015, and none were made. This Court has reviewed the R&R, and will adopt it in its entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 22) in full. Thus, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a Court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Source: Leagle
