Annmarie M. v. Commissioner of Social Security, 18-cv-1430-JES-JEH. (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20200317a04
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. SHADID , District Judge . This matter is now before the Court on a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Hawley. Doc. 18. More than 14 days have elapsed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation, and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 , 539 (7th Cir. 1986). As the parties have not presented timely objec
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. SHADID , District Judge . This matter is now before the Court on a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Hawley. Doc. 18. More than 14 days have elapsed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation, and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 , 539 (7th Cir. 1986). As the parties have not presented timely object..
More
ORDER
JAMES E. SHADID, District Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Hawley. Doc. 18. More than 14 days have elapsed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation, and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). As the parties have not presented timely objections, any such objections have been waived. Id. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18), denies Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13), and grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Affirmance (Doc. 17). This matter is now terminated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
