U.S. v. AGUILERA, 09 CR 669-5. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20160120976
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES B. ZAGEL , District Judge . In the case of Antonio Aguilera, Amendment 782 does not lower his guideline range. Because of the amount of cocaine involved, the sentence guideline range remains at level 38. As a result, his guideline range was not reduced or changed. The remedy that Petitioner seeks is not available unless his sentencing range is subsequently lowered, and his guideline has not been lowered in his case. The motion to reduce sentence is theref
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES B. ZAGEL , District Judge . In the case of Antonio Aguilera, Amendment 782 does not lower his guideline range. Because of the amount of cocaine involved, the sentence guideline range remains at level 38. As a result, his guideline range was not reduced or changed. The remedy that Petitioner seeks is not available unless his sentencing range is subsequently lowered, and his guideline has not been lowered in his case. The motion to reduce sentence is therefo..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. ZAGEL, District Judge.
In the case of Antonio Aguilera, Amendment 782 does not lower his guideline range. Because of the amount of cocaine involved, the sentence guideline range remains at level 38. As a result, his guideline range was not reduced or changed. The remedy that Petitioner seeks is not available unless his sentencing range is subsequently lowered, and his guideline has not been lowered in his case. The motion to reduce sentence is therefore denied.
Source: Leagle
